<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blågg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blaagg.tadkom.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net</link>
	<description>blaagg.tadkom.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:10:26 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Spotify &#8211; Missing songs.. by fgdgfgfdg</title>
		<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net/teknologi/spotify-missing-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>fgdgfgfdg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaagg.tadkom.net/?p=121#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>if you search hotel california/pretty maids all in a row it will come up with the original version by the eagles, it has 0 popularity where as the cover has almost full bar :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you search hotel california/pretty maids all in a row it will come up with the original version by the eagles, it has 0 popularity where as the cover has almost full bar <img src='http://blaagg.tadkom.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pentax k-m / k2000 by Kostas</title>
		<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net/teknologi/pentax-k-m-k2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Kostas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaagg.tadkom.net/?p=138#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>This is a Great All-Around Camera that someone can own. 
Cheap, well built with great features that even bigger frame and more expensive cameras would be jealous.
Battery life is outstanding i have it now for 2 and half months in the original energizer batteries.
I want to buy another lens though cause i am still with the original 18-55.
anyways nice blog :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a Great All-Around Camera that someone can own.<br />
Cheap, well built with great features that even bigger frame and more expensive cameras would be jealous.<br />
Battery life is outstanding i have it now for 2 and half months in the original energizer batteries.<br />
I want to buy another lens though cause i am still with the original 18-55.<br />
anyways nice blog <img src='http://blaagg.tadkom.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pentax k-m / k2000 by Steven</title>
		<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net/teknologi/pentax-k-m-k2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1599</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 05:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaagg.tadkom.net/?p=138#comment-1599</guid>
		<description>I too have the Km. Its a lovely camera and performs very well. I dont really need any camera stabilization because I am lucky that I dont have bad &quot;shooting&quot; techniques. In the &quot;old&quot; days there was no such thing anyway. Today everyone goes on about shake reduction. I am glad that Pentax has built this feature into the camera as a bonus to using any lens suited to it. This gives 25 million good reasons for it. My wife pointed out to me why is a camera body that lacks shake reduction features cost equally if not more than one that has considering the infinate capabillities of one that has body stabilization? My answer to her, &quot;these brands want their dedicated film owners to shelve their valuable lenses they have scrap it and have to go out and buy a repeat of focal length they already have with in lens stabilization as the cost. This is a great marketing tool. I love the decsent people at Pentax for respecting the quality and build quality of SMC Super A and other superb Pentax, Takumar, Sigma lenses  that can be mounted on Pentax Digital cameras. The ones I have are all alloy with the K mount fixed to ALLOY. Theres no better build quality than these lenses. The modern day equivalents do come with alloy K mounts as do rival brands but are still fixed to plastic within that lens. Km K10 K200 or whatever Pentax for that matter keeps all photographers that use them to be able to utilize their lens collection and surely that must equate to a better option than the rival brands that can cost its owners an arm and a leg and ditch their old lenses. I know someone who has a Canon and has a collections of lenses for a canon film camera and when questioned about the  non use of these lenses on his new digital camera, the answer was that these are crappy lenses! My reply &quot;but arnt they Canon lenses? LOL His reply &quot;Yes&quot;! What more can one say. LMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have the Km. Its a lovely camera and performs very well. I dont really need any camera stabilization because I am lucky that I dont have bad &#8220;shooting&#8221; techniques. In the &#8220;old&#8221; days there was no such thing anyway. Today everyone goes on about shake reduction. I am glad that Pentax has built this feature into the camera as a bonus to using any lens suited to it. This gives 25 million good reasons for it. My wife pointed out to me why is a camera body that lacks shake reduction features cost equally if not more than one that has considering the infinate capabillities of one that has body stabilization? My answer to her, &#8220;these brands want their dedicated film owners to shelve their valuable lenses they have scrap it and have to go out and buy a repeat of focal length they already have with in lens stabilization as the cost. This is a great marketing tool. I love the decsent people at Pentax for respecting the quality and build quality of SMC Super A and other superb Pentax, Takumar, Sigma lenses  that can be mounted on Pentax Digital cameras. The ones I have are all alloy with the K mount fixed to ALLOY. Theres no better build quality than these lenses. The modern day equivalents do come with alloy K mounts as do rival brands but are still fixed to plastic within that lens. Km K10 K200 or whatever Pentax for that matter keeps all photographers that use them to be able to utilize their lens collection and surely that must equate to a better option than the rival brands that can cost its owners an arm and a leg and ditch their old lenses. I know someone who has a Canon and has a collections of lenses for a canon film camera and when questioned about the  non use of these lenses on his new digital camera, the answer was that these are crappy lenses! My reply &#8220;but arnt they Canon lenses? LOL His reply &#8220;Yes&#8221;! What more can one say. LMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some updates.. by Camera Dude</title>
		<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net/ukategorisert/some-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1598</link>
		<dc:creator>Camera Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 09:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaagg.tadkom.net/ukategorisert/some-updates/#comment-1598</guid>
		<description>:jealous: i have always thought that was pretty neat camera. It is still top of my list, but I am holding my breath for the upcoming model in the hope that it will be a better deal. Blow it, I will probably flex the plastic and get it ordered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:jealous: i have always thought that was pretty neat camera. It is still top of my list, but I am holding my breath for the upcoming model in the hope that it will be a better deal. Blow it, I will probably flex the plastic and get it ordered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Klein Bottle by romedius</title>
		<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net/bog-skinke/klein-bottle/comment-page-1/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>romedius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaagg.tadkom.net/?p=53#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>Hey! Cool stuff! 
I have already seen the TED talk before, it&#039;s really amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Cool stuff!<br />
I have already seen the TED talk before, it&#8217;s really amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spotify &#8211; Missing songs.. by Håvard</title>
		<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net/teknologi/spotify-missing-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Håvard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaagg.tadkom.net/?p=121#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really mind pirating the stuff that&#039;s not there. I&#039;m a paying customer of spotify and If they want my money they have to sign with spotify or create something equivalent. I don&#039;t like having more than one music-player-app though. I&#039;m paying for convenience, make it convenient and you&#039;ll get my money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really mind pirating the stuff that&#8217;s not there. I&#8217;m a paying customer of spotify and If they want my money they have to sign with spotify or create something equivalent. I don&#8217;t like having more than one music-player-app though. I&#8217;m paying for convenience, make it convenient and you&#8217;ll get my money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell SDK on Ubuntu (Feisty Fawn). by vivithemage</title>
		<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net/teknologi/cell-sdk-on-ubuntu-feisty-fawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>vivithemage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaagg.tadkom.net/teknologi/linux/cell-sdk-on-ubuntu-feisty-fawn/#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>well done, very informative concise tutorial.

echo &quot;none /spu spufs defaults 0 0&quot; &gt;&gt; /etc/fstab

is exactly what i needed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done, very informative concise tutorial.</p>
<p>echo &#8220;none /spu spufs defaults 0 0&#8243; &gt;&gt; /etc/fstab</p>
<p>is exactly what i needed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Revivial.. by Håvard Sørbø</title>
		<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net/ukategorisert/revivial/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>Håvard Sørbø</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 10:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaagg.tadkom.net/?p=82#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>Nice, layout! seems to be some utf8-problems though. Good luck posting every two weeks :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, layout! seems to be some utf8-problems though. Good luck posting every two weeks <img src='http://blaagg.tadkom.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HÃ¥vard &#8211; Bringer of Entropy by Harry Berg</title>
		<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net/bog-skinke/havard-bringer-of-entropy/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaagg.tadkom.net/?p=56#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Heheh! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heheh! <img src='http://blaagg.tadkom.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Secure beneath the watchful eyes.. by Ian Hutchison</title>
		<link>http://blaagg.tadkom.net/tanker/secure-beneath-the-watchful-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Hutchison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaagg.tadkom.net/?p=62#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Hey,


If you are able to get a hold of a &quot;Secure beneath the watchful eyes&quot; poster let me know. I&#039;ve been looking for one for 2 years!


Thanks,

Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>If you are able to get a hold of a &#8220;Secure beneath the watchful eyes&#8221; poster let me know. I&#8217;ve been looking for one for 2 years!</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
